In comparison to parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition in severe pancreatitis is associated with which outcome?

Prepare for the ASPEN Certified Nutrition Support Clinician (CNSC) Exam. Study with structured quizzes and detailed insights to enhance your knowledge and readiness. Get set for success!

Multiple Choice

In comparison to parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition in severe pancreatitis is associated with which outcome?

Explanation:
The key idea is that feeding through the gut helps protect the body's defenses in severe pancreatitis. Enteral nutrition preserves gut mucosal integrity and supports the gut-associated immune system, which reduces bacterial translocation from the intestine into the bloodstream. This leads to fewer infectious complications compared with parenteral nutrition, which bypasses the gut and is associated with higher infection risk from central venous access and gut atrophy that can promote bacterial translocation. So enteral nutrition tends to lower infectious morbidity. The other options don’t fit because parenteral nutrition typically increases infection risk, and studies show a clear benefit rather than no change or an unknown effect.

The key idea is that feeding through the gut helps protect the body's defenses in severe pancreatitis. Enteral nutrition preserves gut mucosal integrity and supports the gut-associated immune system, which reduces bacterial translocation from the intestine into the bloodstream. This leads to fewer infectious complications compared with parenteral nutrition, which bypasses the gut and is associated with higher infection risk from central venous access and gut atrophy that can promote bacterial translocation. So enteral nutrition tends to lower infectious morbidity. The other options don’t fit because parenteral nutrition typically increases infection risk, and studies show a clear benefit rather than no change or an unknown effect.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy