Which of the following is NOT a benefit of EN over PN in severe acute pancreatitis?

Prepare for the ASPEN Certified Nutrition Support Clinician (CNSC) Exam. Study with structured quizzes and detailed insights to enhance your knowledge and readiness. Get set for success!

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is NOT a benefit of EN over PN in severe acute pancreatitis?

Explanation:
Early enteral nutrition helps preserve gut integrity and modulate the inflammatory response in severe acute pancreatitis. By delivering nutrients directly to the gut, EN reduces bacterial translocation and infectious complications, which in turn lowers mortality and often shortens hospital length of stay compared with parenteral nutrition. Pain management in pancreatitis is driven by the disease process and analgesia, not by the route of feeding, so there isn’t a direct pain benefit from EN. The option describing increased pain is therefore not a benefit of EN over PN, while the other outcomes (lower mortality, shorter LOS, and fewer infections) are established advantages of EN.

Early enteral nutrition helps preserve gut integrity and modulate the inflammatory response in severe acute pancreatitis. By delivering nutrients directly to the gut, EN reduces bacterial translocation and infectious complications, which in turn lowers mortality and often shortens hospital length of stay compared with parenteral nutrition. Pain management in pancreatitis is driven by the disease process and analgesia, not by the route of feeding, so there isn’t a direct pain benefit from EN. The option describing increased pain is therefore not a benefit of EN over PN, while the other outcomes (lower mortality, shorter LOS, and fewer infections) are established advantages of EN.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy